lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/4] device property: constify property arrays values
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:52:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 09:07 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On February 2, 2017 8:48:30 AM PST, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko
> > @linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 08:39 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Data that is fed into property arrays should not be modified, so
> > >
> > > let's
> > > > mark
> > > > relevant pointers as const. This will allow us making source
> > > > arrays
> > >
> > > as
> > > > const/__initconst.
> > > >
> > > > Also fix memory leaks on errors in property_entry_copy().
> > >
> > > While the code looks okay, I'm not sure what memory leaks you are
> > > referring to. The idea as far as I remember was to run *free()
> > > function
> > > if *copy() fails.
> >
> > That could have been OK for internal function, but will not work for
> > public API, as it goes against normal pattern.
> >
> > You will be old and grey and still correcting patches that would be
> > getting it wrong :)
>
> Yes, which sounds not exactly as "we have memory leaks and here we are
> fixing them". So, my comment regarding to phrasing of the commit
> message. Someone might mistakenly think that it needs to be ported as
> earlier as this had been introduced.

OK, I'll leave it up to Rafael to massage the commit message as he sees
fit.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-02 19:51    [W:0.058 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site