lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit
From
Date
Christopher Covington wrote:
> Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
> of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
> make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present. I think it's a
lot clearer. Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-15 15:06    [W:2.033 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site