Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit | From | Timur Tabi <> | Date | Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:05:34 -0600 |
| |
Christopher Covington wrote: > Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence > of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would > make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.
I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present. I think it's a lot clearer. Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".
-- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
| |