lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x fixed post-divider to MMC module clocks
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:10:39AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:30:26AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Maxime Ripard
> >> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:19:12PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> >> On the A64, the MMC module clocks are fixed in the new timing mode,
> >> >> i.e. they do not have a bit to select the mode. These clocks have
> >> >> a 2x divider somewhere between the clock and the MMC module.
> >> >>
> >> >> To be consistent with other SoCs supporting the new timing mode,
> >> >> we model the 2x divider as a fixed post-divider on the MMC module
> >> >> clocks.
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch adds the post-dividers to the MMC clocks.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> >
> >> > I had a doubt applying that one... sorry.
> >> >
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> >> >> index 2bb4cabf802f..ee9c12cf3f08 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
> >> >> @@ -400,28 +400,45 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(nand_clk, "nand", mod0_default_parents, 0x080,
> >> >> BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> 0);
> >> >>
> >> >> +/*
> >> >> + * MMC clocks are the new timing mode (see A83T & H3) variety, but without
> >> >> + * the mode switch. This means they have a 2x post divider between the clock
> >> >> + * and the MMC module. This is not documented in the manual, but is taken
> >> >> + * into consideration when setting the mmc module clocks in the BSP kernel.
> >> >> + * Without it, MMC performance is degraded.
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + * We model it here to be consistent with other SoCs supporting this mode.
> >> >> + * The alternative would be to add the 2x multiplier when setting the MMC
> >> >> + * module clock in the MMC driver, just for the A64.
> >> >> + */
> >> >> static const char * const mmc_default_parents[] = { "osc24M", "pll-periph0-2x",
> >> >> "pll-periph1-2x" };
> >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc0_clk, "mmc0", mmc_default_parents, 0x088,
> >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */
> >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */
> >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */
> >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> - 0);
> >> >> -
> >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc1_clk, "mmc1", mmc_default_parents, 0x08c,
> >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */
> >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */
> >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */
> >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> - 0);
> >> >> -
> >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc2_clk, "mmc2", mmc_default_parents, 0x090,
> >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */
> >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */
> >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */
> >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> - 0);
> >> >> +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc0_clk, "mmc0",
> >> >> + mmc_default_parents, 0x088,
> >> >> + 0, 4, /* M */
> >> >> + 16, 2, /* P */
> >> >> + 24, 2, /* mux */
> >> >> + BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> + 2, /* post-div */
> >> >> + 0);
> >> >> +
> >> >> +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc1_clk, "mmc1",
> >> >> + mmc_default_parents, 0x08c,
> >> >> + 0, 4, /* M */
> >> >> + 16, 2, /* P */
> >> >> + 24, 2, /* mux */
> >> >> + BIT(31), /* gate */
> >> >> + 2, /* post-div */
> >> >> + 0);
> >> >> +
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure that the divider there for the non-eMMC clocks? Usually,
> >> > the new mode is only here for the eMMC, so we would divide the rate by
> >> > two in the non-eMMC case.
> >>
> >> The new mode is there for all MMC controllers. The other two MMC
> >> controllers even have the old/new timing mode switch. In case you
> >> forgot we have ".need_new_timings" set for the A64 compatible.
> >
> > But then, shouldn't we model them as such, using the work you did on
> > the A83t clocks?
>
> On the A64, the clocks don't have the switch. Only the MMC controller
> does. On the A83T, both do.

Ah, right. I've applied both patches.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-07 10:11    [W:0.055 / U:9.132 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site