lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
From
Date
Op 06-12-17 om 13:15 schreef Michal Hocko:
> On Mon 04-12-17 14:36:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>> So far, resume from suspend-to-RAM (ACPI S3) is broken on all of the
>>> systems I have tested, so it is probably safe to assume it to be
>>> broken everywhere.
>> Oh, it's definitely not broken everywhere, because I use it myself,
>> and was traveling last week due to my mom's bday.
>>
>> HOWEVER.
>>
>> Some of the x86 work seems to have broken it for some configurations.
>> In particular, do you have a big "everything enabled" kernel config -
>> particularly lockdep and irqflags tracing enabled?
>>
>> Andy has a patch, but it hasn't made it to me yet (probably because
>> the x86 people are very busy with the kaiser work):
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/30/546
>>
>> (also note his follow-up "fix the commit message" note, but that one
>> doesn't actually affect the code itself).
> merging tip/x86/urgent on top of your tree fixed this problem for me,
> but I am seeing something else
> [ 131.711412] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
> [ 131.755328] ACPI: EC: event blocked
> [ 131.755328] ACPI: EC: EC stopped
> [ 131.755328] PM: Saving platform NVS memory
> [ 131.755344] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> [ 131.779330] IRQ 124: no longer affine to CPU1
> [ 131.780334] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
> [ 131.804465] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
> [ 131.827291] IRQ 122: no longer affine to CPU3
> [ 131.827292] IRQ 123: no longer affine to CPU3
> [ 131.828293] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
> [ 131.830991] ACPI: Low-level resume complete
> [ 131.831092] ACPI: EC: EC started
> [ 131.831093] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
> [ 131.831864] do_IRQ: 0.55 No irq handler for vector
> [ 131.831884] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> [ 131.831909] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> [ 131.831910] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
> [ 131.832913] cache: parent cpu1 should not be sleeping
> [ 131.833058] CPU1 is up
> [ 131.833067] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x1
> [ 131.833864] cache: parent cpu2 should not be sleeping
> [ 131.833983] CPU2 is up
> [ 131.833995] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 3 APIC 0x3
> [ 131.834776] cache: parent cpu3 should not be sleeping
> [ 131.834923] CPU3 is up
>
> "No irq handler" part looks a bit scary (maybe related to lost affinity
> messages?) but the following messages look quite as well. Is this
> something known? The system seems to be up and running without any
> visible issues.

Another reproducer for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198033 ?
Symptoms are similar..

~Maarten

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-06 13:32    [W:0.141 / U:8.072 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site