lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel-classd: select correct Kconfig symbol
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 at 11:09:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Commit 061981ff8cc8 ("ASoC: atmel: properly select dma driver state")
>> changed the way that the dependencies are handled, but then the
>> Class D amplifier support got merged, which used the old method.
>>
>> This seems to have triggered a very rare randconfig condition for me
>> now, leading to a link error:
>>
>> sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.o: In function `atmel_ssc_set_audio':
>> atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register'
>> atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0x79c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register'
>> sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.o: In function `atmel_ssc_put_audio':
>> atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0xf24): undefined reference to `atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister'
>> atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0xf24): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister'
>>
>> Changing it to select SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA as intended rather than
>> SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA directly makes it work again.
>>
>> Fixes: e0a25b6d1862 ("ASoC: atmel-classd: add the Audio Class D Amplifier")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

Unfortunately, my testing just found a new problem with this patch
applied, I had
not run enough randconfig tests on top of it:

sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.o: In function `atmel_ssc_set_audio':
atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0x73c): undefined reference to `ssc_request'
sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.o: In function `atmel_ssc_put_audio':
atmel_ssc_dai.c:(.text+0x7be): undefined reference to `ssc_free'

This is for a configuration with SND_ATMEL_SOC_CLASSD=y
and CONFIG_ATMEL_SSC=n. Could you tell me whether that is a
sensible configuration that should work, or whether we need a dependency
on ATMEL_SSC in SND_ATMEL_SOC_CLASSD? I can't really tell
from the source code, but you probably know the answer.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-05 12:14    [W:0.065 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site