lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix the driver probe() fail due to disabled GICC entry
From
Date
On 03/12/17 23:21, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> As per MADT specification, it's perfectly valid firmware can pass
> MADT table to OS with disabled GICC entries. ARM64-SMP code skips
> those cpu cores to bring online. However the current GICv3 driver
> probe bails out in this case on systems where redistributor regions
> are not in the always-on power domain.
>
> This patch does the two things to fix the panic.
> - Don't return an error in gic_acpi_match_gicc() for disabled GICC.
> - No need to keep GICR region information for disabled GICC.
>
> Kernel crash traces:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: No interrupt controller found.
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.5 #26
> [<ffff000008087770>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x218
> [<ffff0000080879dc>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
> [<ffff00000883b078>] dump_stack+0x98/0xb8
> [<ffff0000080c5c14>] panic+0x118/0x26c
> [<ffff000008b62348>] init_IRQ+0x24/0x2c
> [<ffff000008b609fc>] start_kernel+0x230/0x394
> [<ffff000008b601e4>] __primary_switched+0x64/0x6c
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: No interrupt controller found.
>
> Disabled GICC subtable example:
> Subtable Type : 0B [Generic Interrupt Controller]
> Length : 50
> Reserved : 0000
> CPU Interface Number : 0000003D
> Processor UID : 0000003D
> Flags (decoded below) : 00000000
> Processor Enabled : 0
> Performance Interrupt Trig Mode : 0
> Virtual GIC Interrupt Trig Mode : 0
> Parking Protocol Version : 00000000
> Performance Interrupt : 00000017
> Parked Address : 0000000000000000
> Base Address : 0000000000000000
> Virtual GIC Base Address : 0000000000000000
> Hypervisor GIC Base Address : 0000000000000000
> Virtual GIC Interrupt : 00000019
> Redistributor Base Address : 0000FFFF88F40000
> ARM MPIDR : 000000000000000D
> Efficiency Class : 00
> Reserved : 000000
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index b56c3e2..a30fbac 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -1331,6 +1331,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare
> u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2;
> void __iomem *redist_base;
>
> + /* GICC entry which has !ACPI_MADT_ENABLED is not unusable so skip */
> + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))
> + return 0;
> +
> redist_base = ioremap(gicc->gicr_base_address, size);
> if (!redist_base)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1374,13 +1378,13 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
>
> /*
> - * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means
> - * GICR base is presented via GICC
> + * If GICC is enabled and has not valid gicr base address, then it means
> + * GICR base is not presented via GICC
> */
> - if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && gicc->gicr_base_address)
> - return 0;
> + if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && (!gicc->gicr_base_address))
> + return -ENODEV;

This doesn't feel quite right. It would mean that having the ENABLED
flag cleared and potentially no address would make it valid? It looks to
me that the original code is "less wrong".

What am I missing?

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-04 11:29    [W:0.053 / U:2.564 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site