lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: remove unnecessary include header from reset.c
On 12/27, Sean Wang wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 12/25, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is indeed not needed for reset.c and thus
> > > it's safe and good change to remove it from the file.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c
> > > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c
> > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
> > > #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >
> > > -#include "clk-mtk.h"
> > > -
> >
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
>
> It cannot be static since the function would be referenced in other
> files under the same folder
>
>
> One point I felt confused which is I didn't see the warning complains
> when I did these build test, even I also added -Werror and -Wall to
> build all files under driver/clk/mediatek. My toolchain is based on gcc
> version 5.2.0 (GCC).
>
>
> If the warning still is, the include "clk-mtk.h" should be good to stay
> there because the declaration it needs is in the clk-mtk.h
>

The warning is from sparse. I built the file with C=2 on the
commandline.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-27 18:38    [W:0.088 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site