Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:38:46 -0800 | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: remove unnecessary include header from reset.c |
| |
On 12/27, Sean Wang wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 12/25, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > > > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > > > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is indeed not needed for reset.c and thus > > > it's safe and good change to remove it from the file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 -- > > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > > > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > > > -#include "clk-mtk.h" > > > - > > > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? > > > > It cannot be static since the function would be referenced in other > files under the same folder > > > One point I felt confused which is I didn't see the warning complains > when I did these build test, even I also added -Werror and -Wall to > build all files under driver/clk/mediatek. My toolchain is based on gcc > version 5.2.0 (GCC). > > > If the warning still is, the include "clk-mtk.h" should be good to stay > there because the declaration it needs is in the clk-mtk.h >
The warning is from sparse. I built the file with C=2 on the commandline.
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |