lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Allow loading modules on architectures without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017, Petr Mladek wrote:

> On Fri 2017-12-08 18:25:23, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > Now that immediate feature was removed, it is not possible to load
> > livepatch modules on architectures without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. Fix
> > it by removing guilty check in klp_register_patch().
> >
> > The architectures without HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE will now rely only on
> > kernelspace/userspace boundary switching, the (fake) signal and force
> > feature.
>
> I do not thing that this is a good idea. It encourages people to use
> the force feature. They might get used to it.
>
> If people are going to provide livepatches, they should be capable
> enough to provide a kernel where it is allowed. IMHO, the upstream
> kernel should not support bad/dirty practices out of box.

You're probably right.

It is true that with immediate gone the only reasonable thing for all
supported architectures is to provide HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE.

Miroslav

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-22 14:13    [W:0.043 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site