lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] PM / core: Direct DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND optimization
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 10 December 2017 at 01:00, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>>

[cut]

>
>> Moreover, what happens when/if a driver that has deployed this
>> solution, starts being used on a new SoC and then additional
>> operations during system suspend becomes required (for example
>> pinctrls that needs to be put in a system sleep state)? Then
>> everything falls apart, doesn't it?
>
> Then you runtime-resume the device in ->suspend() and the remaining
> callbacks will run for you just fine.

BTW, I guess you'll need a middle layer in that case anyway so that
the driver doesn't have to distinguish between platforms it has to
work with which makes the argument somewhat moot.

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-19 12:19    [W:0.051 / U:9.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site