Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: check nid range before use to avoid segmentation fault | From | Sheng Yong <> | Date | Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:06:58 +0800 |
| |
On 2017/12/15 14:26, Yunlong Song wrote: > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> > --- > fsck/fsck.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c > index 11b8b0b..2212aa3 100644 > --- a/fsck/fsck.c > +++ b/fsck/fsck.c > @@ -14,6 +14,15 @@ > char *tree_mark; > uint32_t tree_mark_size = 256; > > +static inline int check_nid_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > +{ > + if (nid < F2FS_ROOT_INO(sbi)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (nid >= NM_I(sbi)->max_nid) > + return -EINVAL; > + return 0; > +} > + Hi Yunlong, I think you could use IS_VALID_NID() instead of check_nid_range. Maybe we could add the check 'if (nid < F2FS_ROOT_INO(sbi))' to IS_VALID_NID().
thanks, Sheng > int f2fs_set_main_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 blk, int type) > { > struct f2fs_fsck *fsck = F2FS_FSCK(sbi); > @@ -740,7 +749,7 @@ void fsck_chk_inode_blk(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 nid, > for (idx = 0; idx < 5; idx++) { > u32 nid = le32_to_cpu(node_blk->i.i_nid[idx]); > > - if (nid != 0) { > + if (nid != 0 && !check_nid_range(sbi, nid)) { > struct node_info ni; > > get_node_info(sbi, nid, &ni); >
| |