lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme
I don't yet have a full picture, but let me make a few comments.

On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 11:25:21AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:

> +static u64 blk_mq_rq_aborted_gstate(struct request *rq)
> +{
> + unsigned int start;
> + u64 aborted_gstate;
> +
> + do {
> + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
> + aborted_gstate = rq->aborted_gstate;
> + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync, start));
> +
> + return aborted_gstate;
> +}

> + /* if in-flight && overdue, mark for abortion */
> + if ((gstate & MQ_RQ_STATE_MASK) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT &&
> + time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline)) {
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
> + rq->aborted_gstate = gstate;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
> + data->nr_expired++;
> + hctx->nr_expired++;
> } else if (!data->next_set || time_after(data->next, deadline)) {

> + /*
> + * ->aborted_gstate is used by the timeout to claim a specific
> + * recycle instance of this request. See blk_mq_timeout_work().
> + */
> + struct u64_stats_sync aborted_gstate_sync;
> + u64 aborted_gstate;

So I dislike that u64_stats_sync thingy. Esp when used on a single
variable like this.

There are two alternatives, but I don't understand the code well enough
to judge the trade-offs.

1) use gstate_seq for this too; yes it will add some superfluous
instructions on 64bit targets, but if timeouts are a slow path
this might not matter.

2) use the pattern we use for cfs_rq::min_vruntime; namely:

u64 aborted_gstate
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
u64 aborted_gstate_copy;
#endif


static inline void blk_mq_rq_set_abort(struct rq *rq, u64 gstate)
{
rq->aborted_gstate = gstate;
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
smp_wmb();
rq->aborted_gstate_copy = gstate;
#endif
}

static inline u64 blk_mq_rq_get_abort(struct rq *rq)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
u64 abort, copy;

do {
copy = rq->aborted_gstate_copy;
smp_rmb();
abort = rq->aborted_gstate;
} while (abort != copy);

return abort;
#else
return rq->aborted_gstate;
#endif
}

which is actually _faster_ than the u64_stats_sync stuff (for a
single variable).


But it might not matter; I just dislike that thing, could be me.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-12 11:10    [W:0.337 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site