lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] IB/ocrdma_hw: remove unnecessary code in ocrdma_mbx_dealloc_lkey

Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>:

> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:56:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:45:17AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> > > Check on return value and goto label mbx_err are unnecessary.
>> > >
>> > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1268780
>> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > Changes in v2:
>> > > Remove assignment from "int status = -ENOMEM" as suggested by Leon
>> > > Romanovsky.
>> > >
>> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_hw.c | 6 ++----
>> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Please use git send-email to send patches and not reply to the
>> conversation.
>> >
>>
>> I'm using mutt.
>> What would be the advantage of using git send-email in this case?
>
> New mail headers, so it won't appear as Reply-To and will be presented
> correctly in mutt's threaded mode.
>

Oh I actually did that on purpose.

So the preferred way to do this is to send the vN of the patch as a
reply to the first patch?
or as a new thread?

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-08 21:17    [W:0.221 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site