Messages in this thread | | | From | "Zi Yan" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC -mm] mm, userfaultfd, THP: Avoid waiting when PMD under THP migration | Date | Fri, 03 Nov 2017 11:00:14 -0400 |
| |
On 3 Nov 2017, at 3:52, Huang, Ying wrote:
> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> > > If THP migration is enabled, the following situation is possible, > > - A THP is mapped at source address > - Migration is started to move the THP to another node > - Page fault occurs > - The PMD (migration entry) is copied to the destination address in mremap >
You mean the page fault path follows the source address and sees pmd_none() now because mremap() clears it and remaps the page with dest address. Otherwise, it seems not possible to get into handle_userfault(), since it is called in pmd_none() branch inside do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page().
> That is, it is possible for handle_userfault() encounter a PMD entry > which has been handled but !pmd_present(). In the current > implementation, we will wait for such PMD entries, which may cause > unnecessary waiting, and potential soft lockup.
handle_userfault() should only see pmd_none() in the situation you describe, whereas !pmd_present() (migration entry case) should lead to pmd_migration_entry_wait().
Am I missing anything here?
-- Best Regards Yan Zi [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |