lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH resend v5 3/3] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Update fusb302 type string, add properties
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 27-10-17 12:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:31:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 27-10-17 12:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> On 26-10-17 22:33, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fusb302 driver as merged in staging uses "typec_fusb302" as i2c-id
>>>>>> rather then just "fusb302" and needs us to set a number of device-
>>>>>> properties, adjust the intel_cht_int33fe driver accordingly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the properties set is max-snk-mv which makes the fusb302 driver
>>>>>> negotiate up to 12V charging voltage, which is a bad idea on boards
>>>>>> which are not setup to handle this, so this commit also adds 2 extra
>>>>>> sanity checks to make sure that the expected Whiskey Cove PMIC +
>>>>>> TI bq24292i charger combo, which can handle 12V, is present.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't apply this one. Is there an immutable branch I need to pick up?
>>>>> Or shall this go via another tree? My base is v4.14-rc5.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It should be applied on top of this patch:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commitdiff/5c003458db40cf3c89aeddd22c6e934c28b5a565
>>>>
>>>> From linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/for-next.
>>>>
>>>> So either we are going to need an immutable branch from you
>>>> with the first patch of this series so that the platform/x86
>>>> maintainers can merge this, or the other way around :|
>>>
>>>
>>> Alternatively we could push this patch as a post rc1 fix I guess.
>>
>>
>> I intentionally did not push out yet until this was cleared. So, I think
>> the most simple option is that I create an immutable branch with only
>> the i2c patches from you. Then linux-platform maintainers can pull in
>> my branch and your patch here on top of that. Would be my favourite.
>>
>> D'accord everyone?
>
>
> Works for me, ack.

Okay, merged, thanks!


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-03 12:56    [W:0.043 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site