Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:28:52 -0600 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap() |
| |
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu): > Half the problem here is that with containers, people are changing the > security model, because they want to let untrusted users have "root", > without really having "root". Part of the fundamental problem is that > there are some well-meaning, but fundamentally misguided people, who > have been asserting: "Containers are just as secure as VM's". > > Well, they are not. And the sooner people get past this, the better > off they'll be....
Just to be clear, module loading requires - and must always continue to require - CAP_SYS_MODULE against the initial user namespace. Containers in user namespaces do not have that.
I don't believe anyone has ever claimed that containers which are not in a user namespace are in any way secure.
(And as for the other claim, I'd prefer to stick to "VMs are in most cases as insecure as properly configured containers" :)
-serge
| |