Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:49:44 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs |
| |
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through.
> case 0: > if (!n--) break; > *args++ = regs->bx; > + /* fall through */
And these gazillions of pointless comments help enabling of -Wimplicit-fallthrough in which way?
Thanks,
tglx
| |