Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:38:18 +0100 | From | Takashi Iwai <> | Subject | Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations |
| |
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > >> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device > >> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)? > > > > I don't mind either case as long as the test works. > > How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked > in reasonable ways?
It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that it worked. The test result should be mentioned concisely.
> >> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns. > > > > It's about your patches, not my system. > > Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of > more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?
You shouldn't rely on my system. The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable.
Takashi
| |