lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails
    From
    Date
    On 11/21/2017 10:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
    > On 11/21/2017 12:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
    >
    >> matters less than breaking the sandbox.
    >>
    >
    > Yes, sorry for that. It wasn't clear to me that there was a sandbox and my
    > lack of familiarity with the code was the reason why I posted as a RFC in
    > the first place.
    >
    > Do you agree with Jason's suggestion to send a synthesized TPM command in
    > the that the command isn't supported?
    >

    Sorry, this should had been: send a synthesized TPM response in the case that
    the command isn't supported.

    Best regards,
    --
    Javier Martinez Canillas
    Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
    Red Hat

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-11-21 10:28    [W:5.268 / U:0.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site