lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] x86/mce: add support SRAO reported via CMC check
Date
In Intel SDM Volume 3B (253669-063US, July 2017), SRAO could be
reported via CMC:

In cases when SRAO is signaled via CMCI the error signature is
indicated via UC=1, PCC=0, S=0.

So we add those known AO MCACODs check in mce_severity().

Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Chen Wei <chenwei68@huawei.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
index 4ca632a..48f239a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
@@ -101,6 +101,16 @@
NOSER, BITCLR(MCI_STATUS_UC)
),

+ /* known AO MCACODs reported via CMC: */
+ MCESEV(
+ AO, "Action optional: memory scrubbing error",
+ SER, MASK(MCI_UC_SAR|MCACOD_SCRUBMSK, MCI_STATUS_UC|MCACOD_SCRUB)
+ ),
+ MCESEV(
+ AO, "Action optional: last level cache writeback error",
+ SER, MASK(MCI_UC_SAR|MCACOD, MCI_STATUS_UC|MCACOD_L3WB)
+ ),
+
/* ignore OVER for UCNA */
MCESEV(
UCNA, "Uncorrected no action required",
--
1.8.3.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-14 06:53    [W:0.053 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site