lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Coccinelle: badzero.cocci failure
Hi Julia,


2017-11-14 18:07 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>:
>> coccicheck failed
>> $ cat cocci-debug.txt
>> /home/masahiro/bin/spatch -D report --no-show-diff --very-quiet
>> --cocci-file scripts/coccinelle/null/badzero.cocci --dir . -I
>> ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated -I ./include -I
>> ./arch/x86/include/uapi -I ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I
>> ./include/uapi -I ./include/generated/uapi --include
>> ./include/linux/kconfig.h --jobs 8 --chunksize 1
>> Fatal error: exception
>> Yes_prepare_ocamlcocci.LinkFailure("/tmp/ocaml_cocci_18c9f9.cmxs")
>
> Does your Coccinelle support OCaml? I'm not sure what is the proper way to
> check for this, but in my coccinelle/config.log file I have
>
> FEATURE_OCAML='1'


Yes. I also see this line in my config.log


> spatch --version gives:
>
> spatch version 1.0.6-00147-g19f9421 compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3
> Flags passed to the configure script: [none]
> Python scripting support: yes
> Syntax of regular expresssions: Str

My version output looks like follows:

$ spatch --version
spatch version 1.0.6-00345-g2ca0bef compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3
Flags passed to the configure script: --prefix=/home/masahiro
Python scripting support: yes
Syntax of regular expresssions: PCRE


> I'm not sure why it doesn't give feedback on whether OCaml scripting is
> supported. I will check on this.
>

Thanks!


--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-14 11:13    [W:0.055 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site