Messages in this thread | | | From | "Reshetova, Elena" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] refcount: provide same memory ordering guarantees as in atomic_t | Date | Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:09:57 +0000 |
| |
<snip>
> Note that there's work done on better documents and updates to this one. > One document that might be good to read (I have not in fact had time to > read it myself yet :-(): > > https://github.com/aparri/memory- > model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt >
I have just finished reading over this and must say that this is excellent. If I would have started reading on this topic from this doc and then move to other in-tree docs, including memory-barriers.txt, I would have had much less issues/questions and it would be much less of a bumpy read.
Is there any plan to include it into official kernel doc tree? I really think it would be very helpful for others also even basically to explain the notations, properties and language people talk about these issues and give examples.
I will try to improve a bit the new doc I have previously sent a patch for in the spirit of this reading.
Best Regards, Elena.
| |