Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip. | From | Ywe Cærlyn <> | Date | Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:53:15 +0100 |
| |
Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: > Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux >>>>>>>>> distribution: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel. >>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System. >>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. >>>>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest >>>>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct >>>>>>>>> attitude. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have >>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Peace, >>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have made a good logo >>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: >>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for >>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a >>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A test channel: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peace, >>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>> >>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse. >>>>>> >>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics >>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it >>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", >>>>> and "free software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, >>>>> and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding >>>>> uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based >>>>> on on my conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that >>>>> things need to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I >>>>> also CC Richard Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make >>>>> considerations for this. The hacker will now not only be free, but >>>>> make money. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Peace. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he >>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record. >>>> >>>> | >>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider >>>> ]]] >>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, >>>> ]]] >>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. >>>> ]]]| >>>> | >>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call >>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us >>>> |none of the credit. Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to >>>> |give us equal mention. >>>> | >>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and >>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in >>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html. >>>> | >>>> |-- >>>> |Dr Richard Stallman >>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) >>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) >>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html. >>>> | >>>> And- >>>> >>>> | >>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider >>>> ]]] >>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, >>>> ]]] >>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. >>>> ]]] >>>> | >>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion. Free software and open >>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous. >>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would >>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free. >>>> | >>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve >>>> |freedom. "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea, >>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say. >>>> | >>>> | >>>> |-- >>>> |Dr Richard Stallman >>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) >>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) >>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html. >>>> | >>>> >>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this >>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of >>>> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed >>>> if it chokes its own success? >>>> >>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains >>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier >>>> and god, he slaves to. >>>> >>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard >>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the >>>> decision? >>>> >>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC >>>> C, and the original unix hacking? >>>> >>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this. >>>> >>> >>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going >>> to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc. >>> >>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg >>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected >>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and >>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A >>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with >>> similar sound of input and output. >>> >>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that. >>> >>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the >>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell. >>> >>> Peace. >> >> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to >> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this. >> >> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution >> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying >> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, >> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And >> minimal jitter programming. >> >> So bye for now. >> > Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also. > > So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of OpenBSD > seems to be more like me. > Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and > if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented > that at all, and is an enemy of this. > So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. > "Unnud Oddox be with you". > > > It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of "GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, "Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.
I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be obtained from me, if wanted: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.
Peaceful Saluations.
| |