lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] blk-throtl: make latency= absolute
Hello, Shaohua.

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> I think the absolute latency would only work for HD. For a SSD, a 4k latency
> probably is 60us and 1M latency is 500us. The disk must be very contended to
> make 4k latency reach 500us. Not sensitive doesn't mean no protection. If the
> use case sets rough latency, say 1ms, there will be no protection for 4k IO at
> all. The baseline latency is pretty reliable for SSD actually. So I'd rather

I don't understand how that would mean no protection. The latency
naturally includes the queueing time on the host side and, even for a
fast SSD device, it isn't too difficult to saturate the device to the
point where the host-side waiting time becomes pretty long. All
that's necessary is IOs being issued faster than completed and we can
almost always do that.

> keeping the baseline latency for SSD but using absolute latency for HD, which
> can be done easily by setting DFL_HD_BASELINE_LATENCY to 0.

I don't think that'd be a good interface choice. It's too misleading.
If we actually need to specify baseline + margin, it'd probably be
better to add another notation - say, "+N" - than overloading the
meaning of "N".

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-10 16:43    [W:0.050 / U:25.612 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site