lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: n900 in next-20170901
* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> [171110 06:43]:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:23:40PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [171109 22:19]:
> > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [171110 03:28]:
> > > > Then I'll follow up on cleaning up save_secure_ram_context later.
> > >
> > > Here's a better version, the static mapping did not get used.. It
> > > just moved the area so it happened to work. It needs to be set
> > > up as MT_MEMORY_RWX_NONCACHED instead.
> >
>
> I see a better version now. Hmm... I guess that it also has the
> problem that I mentioned on first version.
>
> > And FYI, here's what I currently have for the follow-up patch,
> > but that can wait a bit.
>
> Okay. So, this patch should be applied on the top of above better version?

Yeah, but we may actually want to combine both patches into a
single patch to avoid the save_secure_ram_context 0xffff translation
limit, see my comments in the first version.

Regards,

Tony

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-10 16:38    [W:0.124 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site