lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: possible deadlock in lru_add_drain_all
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:25:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But this report only includes a single (cpu-up) part and therefore is

Thanks for fixing me, Peter. I thought '#1 -> #2' and '#2 -> #3', where
#2 is 'cpuhp_state', should have been built with two different classes
of #2 as the latest code. Sorry for confusing Michal.

> not affected by that change other than a lock name changing.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-01 09:31    [W:0.142 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site