lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/9] usb: host: isp1362-hcd: mark expected switch fall-through

Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:

[..]
>>
>> Sure thing.
>>
>> Just some questions about the process to follow:
>>
>> Should I send a v2 replying to this particular thread only? like [PATCH v2
>> 6/9]
>> or should I send just a new patch separated from this patch series? I guess
>> this is the case.
>
> Brand new patch is fine, this is gone from my patch queue.
>
>> Some maintainers have told me that in cases where a particular patch in the
>> series needs an update, the complete patchset should be sent again.
>> But I think that depends on the functional impact the patch has over
>> the whole patchset.
>
> Yes, it all depends, the rest of these patches are already in my tree.
>

OK. I'll send a new patch shortly.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-01 18:42    [W:0.046 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site