Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 01 Nov 2017 12:41:08 -0500 | From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/9] usb: host: isp1362-hcd: mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
[..] >> >> Sure thing. >> >> Just some questions about the process to follow: >> >> Should I send a v2 replying to this particular thread only? like [PATCH v2 >> 6/9] >> or should I send just a new patch separated from this patch series? I guess >> this is the case. > > Brand new patch is fine, this is gone from my patch queue. > >> Some maintainers have told me that in cases where a particular patch in the >> series needs an update, the complete patchset should be sent again. >> But I think that depends on the functional impact the patch has over >> the whole patchset. > > Yes, it all depends, the rest of these patches are already in my tree. >
OK. I'll send a new patch shortly.
Thanks! -- Gustavo A. R. Silva
| |