lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/3] arm64: add a macro for SError synchronization
Date
> 
> On 01/11/17 12:54, gengdongjiu wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> >
> > On 2017/11/1 19:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >>> + esb
> >>> +alternative_else_nop_endif
> >>> +1:
> >>> + .endm
> >> Having a branch in here is pretty horrible, and furthermore using
> >> label number 1 has a pretty high chance of subtly breaking code where
> >> this macro is inserted.
> >>
> >> Can we not somehow nest or combine the alternative conditions here?
> >
> > I found it will report error if combine the alternative conditions here.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > + .macro error_synchronize
> > +alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IESB
> > +alternative_if ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN
> > + esb
> > +alternative_else_nop_endif
> > +alternative_else_nop_endif
> > + .endm
> >
> > And even using b.eq/cbz instruction in the alternative instruction in
> > arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S, it will report Error.
> >
> > For example below
> >
> > alternative_if ARM64_HAS_PAN
> > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > b.eq xxxxx
> > alternative_else_nop_endif
> >
> > I do not dig it deeply, do you know the reason about it or good suggestion about that?
> > Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> Actually, on second look ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN doesn't even matter - ESB is a hint, so if the CPU doesn't have RAS it should behave as a
> NOP anyway.


Yes, you are right. It is "HINT #16"

So in fact it can be written below:

+ .macro error_synchronize
+alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_IESB
+ esb
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+ .endm

If written to that, whether it will be strange? although ESB should behave as a
NOP anyway if the CPU doesn't have RAS.

>
> On which note, since I don't see one here - are any of those other patches defining an "esb" assembly macro similar to the inline asm case?
> If not then this isn't going to build with older toolchains - perhaps we should just use the raw hint syntax directly.


Sorry for that I do not push the dependent patch[1].
The "ESB" is defined as a macro

/*
+ * RAS Error Synchronization barrier
+ */
+ .macro esb
+ hint #16
+ .endm
+
+/*

[1]
https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg612884.html

>
> Robin.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-01 15:20    [W:0.032 / U:1.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site