Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:47:46 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.9 086/104] arm64: kasan: avoid bad virt_to_pfn() |
| |
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:00:53PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote:
> In this case, for example, this patch had a "review cycle" of 18 days > where 4 different emails regarding this patch were sent out as it was > making it's way through review and queues, so we already try to be > as "loud" as we can with it.
As someone on the reviewing side what I'm seeing is a bunch of stable maintainers sending fairly large patch serieses that look like normal stable review things. That's not very loud. I usually don't spend that much time on stable reviews as up until this started happening anything that went in was either something I'd pushed in directly or something where I had spent more time on already after someone had sent a "hey, we should backport this" mail. Mails that look like the ones that have been sent are just confirming prior review. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |