lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.2 00/46] 3.2.81-rc1 review
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 23:35 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
    > On Tuesday 14 June 2016 11:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 22:56 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
    > > > On Sunday 12 June 2016 10:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.81 release.
    > > > > There are 46 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
    > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    > > > > let me know.
    > > > >
    > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 UTC 2016.
    > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
    > > >
    > > > m32r allmodconfig build is failing.
    > > >
    > > > you will also need - 71a49d16f06d ("m32r: add definition of ioremap_wc
    > > > to io.h")
    > > >
    > > > build log is at: https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/builds/1771270
    > >
    > > None of these patches add a call to ioremap_wc(), and none of the
    > > changes since v3.2 added such a call. So I think it can wait for
    > > another stable cycle. Anyway, isn't it really this commit that's
    > > needed:
    > >
    > > commit 92a8ed4c7643809123ef0a65424569eaacc5c6b0
    > > Author: Sudip Mukherjee
    > > <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
    > > Date: Tue Dec 29 14:54:19 2015 -0800
    > >
    > > m32r: add io*_rep helpers
    > >
    >
    > Looks like today is a bad day. I tested with:
    > 92a8ed4c7643 ("m32r: add io*_rep helpers") and that gave me another
    > failure which needed:
    > 71a49d16f06d ("m32r: add definition of ioremap_wc to io.h")

    I've belatedly queued up both of those for 3.2 and 3.16.

    Ben.

    > >
    > > > It doesnot apply cleanly, if you want I can send you the backported version.
    > > >
    > > > Some other builds are also failing but i dont think i can check them
    > > > before your deadline.
    > > > My other builds are at:
    > > > https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/pipelines/3510592
    > >
    > > As some of these failures are caused by not adding include/rdma/ib.h,
    > > please let me know when you have results with that fixed.
    >
    > Its pending at https://gitlab.com/sudipm/linux-next/pipelines/3519324
    >
    > Regards
    > Sudip
    >
    --
    Ben Hutchings
    compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-10-08 20:56    [W:2.317 / U:0.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site