lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] coccinelle: api: detect duplicate chip data arrays
From
Date
On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 12:46 -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 21:19 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 21:13 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > > > 2017-10-01 21:42 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>:
> > > > > > > This semantic patch detects duplicate arrays declared using BQ27XXX_DATA
> > > > > > > within a single structure. It is currently specific to the file
> > > > > > > drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c.
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for picking it up.
> > > >
> > > > If it is specific to one file, why not just run it
> > > > and post the resultant patch? Why have it in tree?
> > >
> > > I guess that they anticipate that the data may change in the future?
> >
> > Aren't you the script author Julia? Who is the "they"?
> >
> > I think having a script for a single file unnecessary.
>
> Sebastian Reichel, the power-supply maintainer, requested this script.
> I previously implemented this as a run-time check within ifdef DEBUG,
> but that was rejected.

Hi Liam.

If you are the author of the script, you should also have
a sign-off/from here right?

This also has a copyright of Inria and Julia Lawall
which, if you are the author, doesn't seem appropriate.

cheers, Joe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-05 21:55    [W:0.102 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site