Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun | From | Cathy Avery <> | Date | Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:31:15 -0400 |
| |
On 10/31/2017 08:24 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>> If you use alloc_ordered_workqueue directly instead of >>> create_singlethread_workqueue you can pass a format string and don't >>> need the separate allocation. >>> >>> But I'm not sure if Tejun is fine with using __WQ_LEGACY directly.. >> The only thing that flag does is exempting the workqueue from possible >> flush deadlock check as we don't know whether WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on a >> legacy workqueue is intentional. There's no reason to add it when >> converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue(). Just decide whether it needs >> forward progress guarantee and use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM if so. > Cathy? >
Sorry for the delay. Long was working on a similar problem and we needed to add a couple of extra patches. I was thinking of sending all three in series but I can send the V3 of this now and follow up with the additional patches. Does that make sense?
| |