Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink() | From | Oliver Hartkopp <> | Date | Sun, 29 Oct 2017 11:51:48 +0100 |
| |
Hi Markus,
this discussion went far beyond the original posted patch for vxcan.c
I would suggest you post your idea of the simplified error handling flow in vxcan.c just on linux-can ML (which is the right mailing list for CAN related stuff).
Thanks, Oliver
On 10/28/2017 10:13 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>> Are you interested in related adjustments for a bigger code base? >> >> No. Definitely not. > > You might have noticed that I am proposing similar changes already > for other software modules. ;-) > > >> If you aim for the the deletion of “ < 0” for all rtnl_configure_link() users >> you would need to do this consistently. > > How do you see the software situation around a function > like “register_netdevice”? > > Regards, > Markus >
| |