lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dwc: dra7xx: Print link state to console for debug
From
Date
David,

On Thursday 19 October 2017 06:56 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Faiz Abbas
>> Sent: 19 October 2017 14:09
>> On Thursday 19 October 2017 06:13 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>> Enable support for printing the LTSSM link state for debugging PCI
>>> when link is down.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> 1. Changed dev_err() to dev_dbg()
>>> 2. Changed static char array to static const char * const
>>> 3. format changes
>>>
>>> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> index 34427a6..0e70e77 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> @@ -98,6 +98,45 @@ struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data {
>>>
>>> #define to_dra7xx_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>>>
>>> +static const char * const state[] = {
>>> + "DETECT_QUIET",
> ...
>>> + "RCVRY_EQ3"
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static inline u32 dra7xx_pcie_readl(struct dra7xx_pcie *pcie, u32 offset)
>>> {
>>> return readl(pcie->base + offset);
>>> @@ -118,6 +157,15 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>> {
>>> struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = to_dra7xx_pcie(pci);
>>> u32 reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_PHY_CS);
>>> + u32 cmd_reg;
>>> + u32 ltssm_state;
>>> +
>>> + if (!(reg & LINK_UP)) {
>>> + cmd_reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx,
>>> + PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_DEVICE_CMD);
>>> + ltssm_state = (cmd_reg & GENMASK(7, 2)) >> 2;
>>> + dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Link state:%s\n", state[ltssm_state]);
>
> Hmmm... GENMASK leaves by hunting header files...> Why not (cmd_reg >> 2) & 63 and explicitly define state[64]
> to guarantee that you never print anything worse than a NULL
> pointer.

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you worried we might print something
outside the array bounds? How is this easier to decipher than GENMASK?

>
>>> + }
>>>
>>> return !!(reg & LINK_UP);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> I missed David's comment in v1. Will submit a new version. Please ignore.
>
> I've a 'neat' trick for generating strings that match constants.
> You can get the compiler to do all the work for you:
> (Assuming I've typed it correctly)
>
> #define LTSSM_DEFS(x) \
> x(DETECT_QUIET) \
> x(DETECT_ACT) \
> (continue for all the names)
>
> Define an enum with the named constants:
> #define X(name) LTSSM_STATE_##name,
> enum (LTSSM_DEFS(X) LTSSM_STATE_SIZE=64);
> #undef X
>
> Array of strings:
> #define X(name) [LTSSM_STATE_##name] = #name
> static const char * const state_names[LTSSM_STATE_SIZE] = { LTSSM_DEFS(X) };
> #undef X
>
> David
>

So I implemented your idea and it looks like this:
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25821834/

I don't know how much we gained by adding the trick. I still had to be
careful not to be off by 1 when writing the list. Plus we are never
saying anything like printk("%s", state[LTSSM_STATE_DETECT_QUIET]. Its a
register read which is used to index the list array.

Thanks,
Faiz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-26 09:59    [W:0.065 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site