Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drivers: base: cacheinfo: arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables | From | Jeremy Linton <> | Date | Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:52:32 -0500 |
| |
Hi,
On 10/19/2017 10:20 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:48:52PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: >> The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache >> topology information. Lets detect ACPI systems and call >> an arch specific cache_setup_acpi() routine to update the hardware >> probed cache topology. >> >> For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine the max number of cache >> levels and populate them using a PPTT table if one is available. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- >> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 1 + >> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 17 +++++++++++------ >> include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 11 +++++++++-- >> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> index 380f2e2fbed5..2e2cf0d312ba 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ >> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >> */ >> >> +#include <linux/acpi.h> >> #include <linux/cacheinfo.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> >> @@ -44,9 +45,17 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, >> this_leaf->type = type; >> } >> >> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI >> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) >> +{ >> + /*ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support*/ >> + return 0; >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) >> { >> - unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, of_level; >> + unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level; >> struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); >> >> for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) { >> @@ -59,15 +68,19 @@ static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) >> leaves += (ctype == CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE) ? 2 : 1; >> } >> >> - of_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu); >> - if (level < of_level) { >> + if (acpi_disabled) >> + fw_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu); >> + else >> + fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu); >> + >> + if (level < fw_level) { >> /* >> * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1 >> * the information may be available in the device tree >> * only unified external caches are considered here >> */ >> - leaves += (of_level - level); >> - level = of_level; >> + leaves += (fw_level - level); >> + level = fw_level; >> } >> >> this_cpu_ci->num_levels = level; >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c >> index c86715fed4a7..b5c6de37e328 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c >> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, >> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache, >> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node) >> { >> + this_leaf->firmware_node = cpu_node; > > This pointer comes from an ACPI static table mapping that happens > to be permanent so it should be safe given that the mapping is carried > out at device_initcall (ie cache_setup_acpi()) but it is not that > obvious. More to it below. > >> if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_SIZE_PROPERTY_VALID) >> this_leaf->size = found_cache->size; >> if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_LINE_SIZE_VALID) >> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c >> index eb3af2739537..8eca279e50d1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c >> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) >> static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, >> struct cacheinfo *sib_leaf) >> { >> - return sib_leaf->of_node == this_leaf->of_node; >> + return sib_leaf->firmware_node == this_leaf->firmware_node; >> } >> >> /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */ >> @@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, >> } >> #endif >> >> +int __weak cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu) >> +{ >> + return -ENOTSUPP; >> +} >> + >> static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu) >> { >> struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); >> @@ -225,11 +230,11 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu) >> if (this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated) >> return 0; >> >> - if (of_have_populated_dt()) >> + if (!acpi_disabled) >> + ret = cache_setup_acpi(cpu); >> + else if (of_have_populated_dt()) >> ret = cache_setup_of_node(cpu); >> - else if (!acpi_disabled) >> - /* No cache property/hierarchy support yet in ACPI */ >> - ret = -ENOTSUPP; >> + >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> @@ -286,7 +291,7 @@ static void cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(unsigned int cpu) >> >> static void cache_override_properties(unsigned int cpu) >> { >> - if (of_have_populated_dt()) >> + if (acpi_disabled && of_have_populated_dt()) >> return cache_of_override_properties(cpu); >> } >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h >> index 6a524bf6a06d..d1e9b8e01981 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h >> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h >> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ enum cache_type { >> * @of_node: if devicetree is used, this represents either the cpu node in >> * case there's no explicit cache node or the cache node itself in the >> * device tree >> + * @firmware_node: Shared with of_node. When not using DT, this may contain >> + * pointers to other firmware based values. Particularly ACPI/PPTT >> + * unique values. >> * @disable_sysfs: indicates whether this node is visible to the user via >> * sysfs or not >> * @priv: pointer to any private data structure specific to particular >> @@ -64,8 +67,10 @@ struct cacheinfo { >> #define CACHE_ALLOCATE_POLICY_MASK \ >> (CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE | CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE) >> #define CACHE_ID BIT(4) >> - >> - struct device_node *of_node; >> + union { >> + struct device_node *of_node; >> + void *firmware_node; >> + }; > > How about turning of_node into a struct fwnode_handle* (and allocate > one for each PPTT cache node - acpi_static_fwnode - to have the > ACPI counterpart) ?
As pointed out internally (with a patch), I converted this whole module into fwnode, but the ACPI side is still a mess because it doesn't map cleanly to what ends up being an relative acpi pointer, mostly because fwnode is really designed more for parsing DT and the ACPI DSDT/etc. So you end up with fwnode routines that simply don't have mappings to PPTT, with IMHO is going to just create far more confusion than any assumed cleanliness that might result.
> > It will make more churn given that that pointer is just used to > carry out a pointer comparison but it's also a bit more elegant.
Except for the huge api surface that takes a fwnode which won't work.
> > Lorenzo > >> bool disable_sysfs; >> void *priv; >> }; >> @@ -98,6 +103,8 @@ int func(unsigned int cpu) \ >> struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu); >> int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu); >> int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu); >> +int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu); >> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu); >> >> const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf); >> >> -- >> 2.13.5 >>
| |