Messages in this thread | | | From | Michael Ellerman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] powerpc/watchdog: Convert timers to use timer_setup() | Date | Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:22:57 +1100 |
| |
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: >> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:47:10 -0700 >>> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>>> >>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> >>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >>>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >>> >>> Looks fine to me. Is this intended to be merged via the powerpc tree >>> in the next merge window? >> >> It relies on the new timer_setup(), which is in one of tglx's trees (I >> think). So I expect it to go via that tree. > > It's in -rc3, but the timer tree can carry it if you want. Which do > you prefer?
Oh sorry, I assumed it was in only in linux-next.
I'll take this. Thanks.
cheers
| |