lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] staging: ion: create one device entry per heap
From
Date
On 10/10/2017 02:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 05:10:37PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 10/09/2017 03:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:25:47PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>>>> Anyway, to move this forward I think we need to see a proof of concept
>>>> of using selinux to protect access to specific heaps.
>
>>> Aren't Unix permissions enough with separate files or am I
>>> misunderstanding what you're looking to see a proof of concept for?
>
>> The goal is to be able to restrict heap access to certain services
>> and selinux groups on Android so straight unix permissions aren't
>> sufficient.
>
> Oh, there's Android users for this? The users I was aware of were
> non-Android. Though even so I'd have thought that given that SELinux is
> a superset of Unix file permissions it ought to be sufficient to be able
> to use them. I'd been thinking people were suggesting SELinux as a
> replacement for file permissions, using the single file and the greater
> capabilities of SELinux.
>
Unix file permissions are necessary but not sufficient, they
can be used separately. Mostly what I want to see before
merging this is an example that splitting the Ion heaps provides
more protection than just keeping /dev/ion.

Thanks,
Laura

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-17 00:10    [W:0.081 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site