Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:23:10 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote: > Hi Silva, > > The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though current code can work correctly. > Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you.
I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please.
Thanks.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
| |