[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] PCI: protect restore with device lock to be consistent
On 10/11/2017 6:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I think this series makes a lot of sense overall; thanks for doing
> this work! I had a few comments on the individual patches.
> (This response would ordinarily be to the cover letter, but there
> isn't one, so I'm just responding to the first patch.)

Thanks, I was too lazy to type it up. I'll do it on the next one.
Since this was an RFC even though the subject doesn't say so, I didn't
want to invest too much time on documentation.

Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-12 18:40    [W:0.069 / U:6.188 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site