Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.9 104/105] f2fs: dont allow encrypted operations without keys | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:51:15 +0200 |
| |
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
commit 363fa4e078cbdc97a172c19d19dc04b41b52ebc8 upstream.
This patch fixes the renaming bug on encrypted filenames, which was pointed by
(ext4: don't allow encrypted operations without keys)
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c @@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old bool is_old_inline = f2fs_has_inline_dentry(old_dir); int err = -ENOENT; + if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) && + !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) || + (f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) && + !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir))) + return -ENOKEY; + if ((old_dir != new_dir) && f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) && !fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode)) { err = -EPERM; @@ -843,6 +849,12 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inod int old_nlink = 0, new_nlink = 0; int err = -ENOENT; + if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) && + !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) || + (f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) && + !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir))) + return -ENOKEY; + if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) || f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir)) && (old_dir != new_dir) && (!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode) ||
| |