lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Flip unlikely() branch to likely() in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
Commit-ID:  4009f4b3a9d8b74547269f293e6a920adf278996
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4009f4b3a9d8b74547269f293e6a920adf278996
Author: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:32:34 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:42:59 +0100

locking/rtmutex: Flip unlikely() branch to likely() in __rt_mutex_slowlock()

Running my likely/unlikely profiler for 3 weeks on two production
machines, I discovered that the unlikely() test in
__rt_mutex_slowlock() checking if state is TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is hit
100% of the time, making it a very likely case.

The reason is, on a vanilla kernel, the majority case of calling
rt_mutex() is from the futex code. This code is always called as
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. In the -rt patch, this code is commonly called when
PREEMPT_RT is enabled with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. But that's not the
likely scenario.

The rt_mutex() code should be optimized for the common vanilla case,
and that is from a futex, with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE as the state.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170119113234.1efeedd1@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 2f443ed..d340be3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
* TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and
* timeout. Ignored otherwise.
*/
- if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) {
+ if (likely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) {
/* Signal pending? */
if (signal_pending(current))
ret = -EINTR;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-30 12:55    [W:0.049 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site