lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] stmmac: Discard masked flags in interrupt status register
From
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:24:43 +0300

> DW GMAC databook says the following about bits in "Register 15 (Interrupt
> Mask Register)":
> --------------------------->8-------------------------
> When set, this bit __disables_the_assertion_of_the_interrupt_signal__
> because of the setting of XXX bit in Register 14 (Interrupt
> Status Register).
> --------------------------->8-------------------------
>
> In fact even if we mask one bit in the mask register it doesn't prevent
> corresponding bit to appear in the status register, it only disables
> interrupt generation for corresponding event.
>
> But currently we expect a bit different behavior: status bits to be in
> sync with their masks, i.e. if mask for bit A is set in the mask
> register then bit A won't appear in the interrupt status register.
>
> This was proven to be incorrect assumption, see discussion here [1].
> That misunderstanding causes unexpected behaviour of the GMAC, for
> example we were happy enough to just see bogus messages about link
> state changes.
>
> So from now on we'll be only checking bits that really may trigger an
> interrupt.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/3/413
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>

This looks good, applied, thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-30 00:26    [W:1.994 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site