Messages in this thread | | | From | Joe Stringer <> | Date | Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:43:52 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 perf/core 5/7] tools lib bpf: Add bpf_program__pin() |
| |
On 26 January 2017 at 11:32, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > Em Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:18:22AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu: >> On 2017/1/25 9:16, Joe Stringer wrote: >> > On 24 January 2017 at 17:06, Wangnan (F) <wangnan0@huawei.com> wrote: >> > > On 2017/1/25 9:04, Wangnan (F) wrote: >> > > Is it possible to use directory tree instead? > >> > > %s/object/mapname >> > > %s/object/prog/instance >> > I don't think objects have names, so let's assume an object with two >> > program instances named foo, and one map named bar. > >> > A call of bpf_object__pin(obj, "/sys/fs/bpf/myobj") would mount with >> > the following files and directories: >> > /sys/fs/bpf/myobj/foo/1 >> > /sys/fs/bpf/myobj/foo/2 >> > /sys/fs/bpf/myobj/bar > >> > Alternatively, if you want to control exactly where you want the >> > progs/maps to be pinned, you can call eg >> > bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, "/sys/fs/bpf/wherever", 0) and that >> > instance will be mounted to /sys/fs/bpf/wherever, or alternatively >> > bpf_program__pin(prog, "/sys/fs/bpf/foo"), and you will end up with >> > /sys/fs/bpf/foo/{0,1}. > >> > This looks pretty reasonable to me. > >> It looks good to me. > > Ok, please continue from perf/core, Ingo merged the first patch of this > patchset today,
Ok thanks, I'll continue from there.
| |