Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:41:52 -0800 | From | tip-bot for Matt Fleming <> | Subject | [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle_balance() |
| |
Commit-ID: 46f69fa33712ad12ccaa723e46ed5929ee93589b Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/46f69fa33712ad12ccaa723e46ed5929ee93589b Author: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:38:12 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:29:32 +0100
sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle_balance()
Future patches will emit warnings if rq_clock() is called before update_rq_clock() inside a rq_pin_lock()/rq_unpin_lock() pair.
Since there is only one caller of idle_balance() we can push the unpin/repin there.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-7-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 4904412..faf80e1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3424,7 +3424,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) return cfs_rq->avg.load_avg; } -static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq); +static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf); #else /* CONFIG_SMP */ @@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) {} static inline void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) {} -static inline int idle_balance(struct rq *rq) +static inline int idle_balance(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { return 0; } @@ -6320,15 +6320,8 @@ simple: return p; idle: - /* - * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked - * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding - * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to - * re-start the picking loop. - */ - rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); - new_tasks = idle_balance(rq); - rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); + new_tasks = idle_balance(rq, rf); + /* * Because idle_balance() releases (and re-acquires) rq->lock, it is * possible for any higher priority task to appear. In that case we @@ -8297,7 +8290,7 @@ update_next_balance(struct sched_domain *sd, unsigned long *next_balance) * idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become * idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs. */ -static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) +static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ; int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; @@ -8311,6 +8304,14 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq) */ this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq); + /* + * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked + * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding + * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to + * re-start the picking loop. + */ + rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf); + if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost || !this_rq->rd->overload) { rcu_read_lock(); @@ -8388,6 +8389,8 @@ out: if (pulled_task) this_rq->idle_stamp = 0; + rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf); + return pulled_task; }
| |