lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 4.0 - A tool for managing md Soft RAID under Linux
From
Date


On 01/12/2017 12:59 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 01/11/17 11:52, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:49:04AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>>> I am pleased to announce the availability of
>>>> mdadm version 4.0
>>>>
>>>> It is available at the usual places:
>>>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/raid/mdadm/
>>>> and via git at
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/mdadm/mdadm.git
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/mdadm/
>>>>
>>>> The update in major version number primarily indicates this is a
>>>> release by it's new maintainer. In addition it contains a large number
>>>> of fixes in particular for IMSM RAID and clustered RAID support. In
>>>> addition this release includes support for IMSM 4k sector drives,
>>>> failfast and better documentation for journaled RAID.
>>> Thank you for the new release. Unfortunately I get 9 failures running the
>>> test suite:
>>>
>>> tests/00raid1... FAILED
>>> tests/07autoassemble... FAILED
>>> tests/07changelevels... FAILED
>>> tests/07revert-grow... FAILED
>>> tests/07revert-inplace... FAILED
>>> tests/07testreshape5... FAILED
>>> tests/10ddf-fail-twice... FAILED
>>> tests/20raid5journal... FAILED
>>> tests/10ddf-incremental-wrong-order... FAILED
>> Yep, several tests usually fail. It appears some checks aren't always good. At
>> least the 'check' function for reshape/resync isn't reliable in my test, I saw
>> 07changelevelintr fails frequently.
> That is my experience as well - some of them are affected by the kernel
> version too. We probably need to look into making them more reliable.

If possible, it could be a potential topic for lsf/mm raid discussion as
Coly suggested
in previous mail.

Is current test can run the test for different raid level, say, "./test
--raidtype=raid1" could
execute all the *r1* tests, does it make sense to do it if we don't
support it now.

Thanks,
Guoqing

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-12 05:26    [W:0.059 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site