Messages in this thread | | | From | Emil Velikov <> | Date | Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:46:28 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm/sti: mark symbols static where possible |
| |
On 8 September 2016 at 10:56, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 10:35:17 AM CEST Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 7 September 2016 at 12:05, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> wrote: >> > We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1: >> As you're going through DRM I was wondering if you have a rough number >> of warnings we get at the various W levels 1,2,... > > I've looked at the W=1 warnings overall, and the count I got a > month ago was 648 warnings for drivers/gpu/:: > > 471 -Werror=missing-prototypes > 12 -Werror=type-limits > 124 -Werror=unused-but-set-variable > 41 -Werror=unused-const-variable= > > vs for the whole kernel > > 2033 -Werror=missing-prototypes > 58 -Werror=suggest-attribute=format > 167 -Werror=type-limits > 1398 -Werror=unused-but-set-variable > 1526 -Werror=unused-const-variable= > > but that was after I had already fixed some of the other warnings > locally. It shouldn't be hard to fix all of them for any given > subsystem, often a single line change gets rid of a number > of individual warnings. > Considering the LOC in the kernel, the number are quite small. Still a fair bit to go.
> My basic idea however is not to do it by subsystem but instead > do it one warning at a time for the entire kernel and then enable > that warning by default without W=1. > Makes perfect sense. Thanks Arnd !
Keep up the good work gents.
Regards, Emil
| |