Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Sep 2016 01:11:57 +0200 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Subject | Re: mm: GPF in __insert_vmap_area |
| |
On 09/06/2016 11:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While running syzkaller fuzzer I've got the following GPF: >> >> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN >> Dumping ftrace buffer: >> (ftrace buffer empty) >> Modules linked in: >> CPU: 2 PID: 4268 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.8.0-rc3-next-20160825+ #8 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >> task: ffff88006a6527c0 task.stack: ffff880052630000 >> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff82e1ccd6>] [<ffffffff82e1ccd6>] >> __list_add_valid+0x26/0xd0 lib/list_debug.c:23 >> RSP: 0018:ffff880052637a18 EFLAGS: 00010202 >> RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90001c87000 >> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88001344cdb0 RDI: 0000000000000008 >> RBP: ffff880052637a30 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 >> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff8a5deee0 R12: ffff88006cc47230 >> R13: ffff88001344cdb0 R14: ffff88006cc47230 R15: 0000000000000000 >> FS: 00007fbacc97e700(0000) GS:ffff88006d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 0000000020de7000 CR3: 000000003c4d2000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 >> DR0: 000000000000001e DR1: 000000000000001e DR2: 0000000000000000 >> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600 >> Stack: >> ffff88006cc47200 ffff88001344cd98 ffff88006cc47200 ffff880052637a78 >> ffffffff817bc6d1 ffff88006cc47208 ffffed000d988e41 ffff88006cc47208 >> ffff88006cc3e680 ffffc900035b7000 ffffc900035a7000 ffff88006cc47200 >> Call Trace: >> [< inline >] __list_add_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:51 >> [< inline >] list_add_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:78 >> [<ffffffff817bc6d1>] __insert_vmap_area+0x1c1/0x3c0 mm/vmalloc.c:340 >> [<ffffffff817bf544>] alloc_vmap_area+0x614/0x890 mm/vmalloc.c:458 >> [<ffffffff817bf8a8>] __get_vm_area_node+0xe8/0x340 mm/vmalloc.c:1377 >> [<ffffffff817c332a>] __vmalloc_node_range+0xaa/0x6d0 mm/vmalloc.c:1687 >> [< inline >] __vmalloc_node mm/vmalloc.c:1736 >> [<ffffffff817c39ab>] __vmalloc+0x5b/0x70 mm/vmalloc.c:1742 >> [<ffffffff8166ae9c>] bpf_prog_alloc+0x3c/0x190 kernel/bpf/core.c:82 >> [<ffffffff85c40ba9>] bpf_prog_create_from_user+0xa9/0x2c0 >> net/core/filter.c:1132 >> [< inline >] seccomp_prepare_filter kernel/seccomp.c:373 >> [< inline >] seccomp_prepare_user_filter kernel/seccomp.c:408 >> [< inline >] seccomp_set_mode_filter kernel/seccomp.c:737 >> [<ffffffff815d7687>] do_seccomp+0x317/0x1800 kernel/seccomp.c:787 >> [<ffffffff815d8f84>] prctl_set_seccomp+0x34/0x60 kernel/seccomp.c:830 >> [< inline >] SYSC_prctl kernel/sys.c:2157 >> [<ffffffff813ccf8f>] SyS_prctl+0x82f/0xc80 kernel/sys.c:2075 >> [<ffffffff86e10700>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1 >> Code: 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 e5 41 54 >> 49 89 fc 48 8d 7a 08 53 48 89 d3 48 89 fa 48 83 ec 08 48 c1 ea 03 <80> >> 3c 02 00 75 7c 48 8b 53 08 48 39 f2 75 37 48 89 f2 48 b8 00 >> RIP [<ffffffff82e1ccd6>] __list_add_valid+0x26/0xd0 lib/list_debug.c:23 >> RSP <ffff880052637a18> >> ---[ end trace 983e625f02f00d9f ]--- >> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception >> >> On commit 0f98f121e1670eaa2a2fbb675e07d6ba7f0e146f of linux-next. >> Unfortunately it is not reproducible.
Can you elaborate? You hit this only once and then never again in this or some other, similar call-trace form, right?
>> The crashing line is: >> CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev, >> >> It crashed on KASAN check at (%rax, %rdx), this address corresponds to >> next address = 0x8. So next was ~NULL. > > Paul, the RCU torture tests passed with the CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST changes, > IIRC, yes? I'd love to rule out some kind of race condition between > the removal and add code for the checking. > > Daniel, IIRC there was some talk about RCU and BPF? Am I remembering
--verbose, what talk specifically? There were some fixes longer time ago, but related to eBPF, not cBPF, but even there I don't see currently how it could be related to a va->list corruption triggered in __insert_vmap_area().
> that correctly? I'm having a hard time imagining how a list add could > fail (maybe a race between two adds)?
Or some use after free that would have corrupted that memory? I would think right now that the path via bpf_prog_alloc() could have triggered, but not necessarily caused the issue, hmm.
| |