lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: core: Remove some redundant validations in mmc_erase() function
On 6 September 2016 at 04:55, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
> Before issuing mmc_erase() function, users always have checked if it can
> erase with mmc_can_erase/trim/discard() function, thus remove the redundant
> erase checking in mmc_erase() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Split into 3 separate patches.
> - Add test tag by Shawn.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Add nr checking and other optimization in mmc_erase() function.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add the alignment if card->erase_size is not power of 2.
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index e55cde6..7d7209d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -2217,13 +2217,6 @@ int mmc_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, unsigned int nr,
> unsigned int rem, to = from + nr;
> int err;
>
> - if (!(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_ERASE) ||
> - !(card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_ERASE))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - if (!card->erase_size)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -

Could we postpone this until after a clean-up-series of the mmc erase functions?

Until the function remains an exported API, I think it should keep
doing this validations.

> if (mmc_card_sd(card) && arg != MMC_ERASE_ARG)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.058 / U:2.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site