Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:45:06 -0400 | From | Paul Gortmaker <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.8-rc5-rt1 beta |
| |
[Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.8-rc5-rt1 beta] On 08/09/2016 (Thu 07:47) Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 14:25 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > Patch conflicts/issues of interest 4.6 --> 4.7 > > ---------------------------------------------- > > > > -v4.7 introduced a lot of users of down_write_killable which wasn't > > implemented for -rt (rwsem_rt.h), so I created one. (see new patch > > rt-create-down_write_killable.patch -- local commit 14625e96ff085f), > > it probably warrants a look see from other people smarter than me. > > You forgot nested, so btrfs won't build. I posted a patchlet here that > includes it.
I didn't see the patchlet, so I just did my own: https://goo.gl/MNiUy7 Let me know if anything looks wrong with it.
I also integrated the latest changes from Sebastian from the 4.6 branch for this 4.8 repo; build tested btrfs and sanity boot tested the series against 4.8-rc6 and pushed the changes out:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/4.8-rt-patches
Everything else is unchanged (incl. the NFS borkage below.)
Paul. --
> > > -Al Viro added a 2nd user of down_read_non_owner into NFS unlink. > > Previously it was just bcache and Sebastian just made that depend on > > !RT_FULL (md-disable-bcache.patch). So we'll need to decide what to > > with that; I just ignored NFS for now, since it is horrible anyway. > > (see upstream commit 884be175351e73c) > > Yeah, that is annoying. I've been carrying a revert ever since, with > poke nfs on todo, but it seems to be marooned there (haven't even > gotten around to generating the first obligatory explosion). > > -Mike
| |