lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/12] x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk()
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:04:47AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:22:00AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:29:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> >> This will prevent a crash if the target task dies before or while
> >> >> dumping its stack once we start freeing task stacks early.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >> >
> >> > Do we need a similar patch for show_stack()?
> >>
> >> Probably. Shouldn't it go in show_stack_log_lvl() instead, though?
> >
> > Yeah, that would probably be better.
>
> This code is a colossal mess. I really hope that, some day, we can
> clarify which entry points are used only in dumpstack*.c and which are
> used elsewhere. Creating an arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.h or just
> merging the three files and removing all the intermediate crap from
> the headers could help a lot.

Agreed, it's a mess, though it's improving with some of my changes.
dumpstack_32.c and dumpstack_64.c will be shrinking, with dump_trace()
getting removed. And they'll be shrinking even more with Linus's
suggestion to remove show_stack_log_lvl(). Then maybe we can look at
merging those two files into dumpstack.c with an #ifdef to separate the
subarch differences.

--
Josh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:59    [W:0.063 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site