Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:38:07 -0700 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [Nbd] [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] nbd improvements |
| |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > A while back, we spent quite some time defining the semantics of the > various commands in the face of the NBD_CMD_FLUSH and NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA > write barriers. At the time, we decided that it would be unreasonable > to expect servers to make these write barriers effective across > different connections.
Do you have a nbd protocol specification? treating a flush or fua as any sort of barrier is incredibly stupid. Is it really documented that way, and if yes, why?
| |